Worthless and Weak

You're all worthless and weak!

Saturday, July 28, 2012

 

Its the Olympics!!!

With the Olympics, a lot of news orgs will report the "medal count," sometimes listing it by # of golds, often by # of medals (with golds as tiebreakers). This is of course silly, as it treats all events as equal. So I've decided to solve this problem, weighing each medal by a value to give a true measure of what each country has won at the olympics, in a a single number.

The principals we have are as follows:

1: Golds are worth more than silvers, which are worth more than bronzes. (with this, its a 5-3-2 ratio for all events)

2: More popular sports should be worth more than less popular sports. Basketball is worth more than Archery, for instance.

3: Sports more associated with the olympics are worth more than those that aren't. Sports in which the olympics aren't the most important event (ie, soccer, tennis) are penalized.

4: Team medals are worth more than individual medals. So the team Archery gold, for instance, is worth 10, while the individual gold is worth 7.5.

5: Sports are weighed by gender importance, for instance Women's gymnastics is worth more than men's gymnastics

6: Total Gender importance should be equal (the total point value of all women's medals should be equal to the total point value of all men's medals)*

7: Sports with more events (such as swimming) will have fewer points per event, (although may have higher point values total).

8: The Decathlon should have the highest point value of any medal; Equestrian Dressage should have the lowest.

Track and field is the most important Sport, followed by Swimming then Gymnastics.

So, without further ado, after one day of Olympics, here is our top 10:



1 USA 22.25
2 CHN 17.625
3 ITA 15.35
4 AUS 12.5
5 KOR 8.125
6 NED 7.5
7 BRA 6.55
8 JPN 5.26
9 KAZ 3.5
10 COL 2.1


The most valuable medal so far is Australia's 4x100 m freestyle relay (swimming).

I'll try to do a daily update with these.

*I decided on this in theory, then thought about it for a second and realized it would be incredibly hard to execute (especially considering that there is a large difference in the number of women's and men's events). After doing all the calculations, I decided to figure out how far off 50/50 I was. Turns out I was at 1495.2 for men, 1494.8 for women. Wasn't sure how I did that one...

PS- watching women's flyweight weightlifting was pretty amazing, very tiny people lifting horribly large amounts of weight.

Comments: Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

Archives

September 2002   October 2002   November 2002   December 2002   January 2003   February 2003   March 2003   April 2003   May 2003   June 2003   July 2003   August 2003   September 2003   October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   January 2011   March 2011   April 2011   July 2011   August 2011   January 2012   July 2012  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]